THE MERCURIAL CONSERVATORY / ANALYSIS + SOUND

The Harmonic Labyrinth

Wander through sound. Discover the mathematics behind each turn.

BEAUTY PROPOSES. EVIDENCE DISPOSES.
A WALK YOU CAN HEAR

Follow the luminous courier.

Each step finds a note. The luminous courier traces the Daedalian labyrinth and lets each turn change the phrase.

Animated musical journey through the maze.
EReady at the entrance
0 / 40 stepsAlways moving
Shape the walk

The stay-put chance is α in the probability controls below.

Cells map to E Dorian by row and column. This is a musical mapping we chose, not a physical property of the maze.

Press Play to follow the luminous courier and hear its path through the Daedalian labyrinth.

32 notes · E Dorian

Seed & sound troubleshooting

Play starts sound. If you hear nothing, check your volume and audio output, then try Test audio. The same seed reproduces the same notes.

INSTRUMENT DECKI — WALK / EVOLUTION
LIVE LAB · HARMONIC MATHEMATICS
Playback boundary: The audible realization changes timbre only; it does not change the underlying mathematics.
I
WORKING STATION

WALK / EVOLUTION

Probability moves through a finite graph. Stationarity, periodicity, laziness, parity and hitting structure stay visible together.

CONTROL → LIVE RESULT → MATH READOUT → INTERPRETATION → INVARIANTS / LOSSES

1. Maze periodicity: stationarity is not convergence

IDENTITY Once the maze is converted to its undirected adjacency graph, the ordinary nearest-neighbor walk is a Markov chain on that graph. Because a perfect grid maze is a tree and every grid edge flips checkerboard parity, the graph is bipartite. A point mass therefore alternates partitions under the nonlazy walk.
π_i = deg(i) / Σ_j deg(j) P_lazy = αI + (1-α)P, 0<α<1 STATIONARITY ≠ CONVERGENCE FROM A POINT MASS
0.50

Gold ring: one walker. Bubbles: the probability of being in each cell. Green and amber mark the two hitting targets; white marks the start.

Maze probability-distribution visualization.

Temporal diagnostics

Walk convergence and parity diagnostic plot.

Top: total-variation distance to the same stationary distribution. Bottom: probability mass on the start cell's bipartition. Nonlazy parity oscillates; laziness damps the oscillation and makes the chain aperiodic.

PROBABILITY SURFACE · z = CURRENT MASS
STATE MIRROR
Linked to the selected ordinary / lazy / stationary distribution.

3-D height is a display coordinate for probability mass only. Exact probabilities remain available numerically.

Hitting / escape quantities

For target A versus B, the exact finite linear systems are solved on the generated graph.

h_i = Σ_j P_ij h_j, h|A=1, h|B=0 T_i = 1 + Σ_j P_ij T_j, T|{A,B}=0

What changes under laziness?

Preserved: graph, communicating class, degree-proportional stationary distribution, hitting probabilities between fixed absorbing targets when self-loops are inserted uniformly.

Changed: temporal spectrum, period, expected clock steps to hit, TV convergence profile.

Break: if self-loop probability varies by state, even hitting-time and reversible-measure relationships can change.

CONTEXTUAL LEDGEROrdinary → uniformly lazy walk
WHAT SURVIVED?

stationary law and hitting probabilities in the stated experiment

WHAT WAS DESTROYED?

period-2 parity locking / original clock

INVERTIBLE?

No: added self-loop changes stepwise trajectory

WHAT WAS ADDED?

self-loops; changed clock

WHERE DOES IT BREAK?

nonuniform/state-dependent laziness needs separate analysis

EVIDENCE CLASS

SHARED MATHEMATICAL STRUCTURE / exact stated relations